I&#039;m not sure if the MVP or &quot;CO-MVP&quot; is determined before or after the season is over, but if it&#039;s not I really think it should be. <br /><br />When I think of an MVP, I think of a combination of things. Regardless, I think the MVP should be in the top 5 of a major stat somewhere. Sure, you may mean a lot to a team and what you do may not show up on the stat-sheet but I believe the MVP would still be a leader in some major category. Simply echoing what Star said here, it depends on how important a player was to his team and where&#039;d they be without him. I also think one of the biggest things is what they do in the play-offs. If they were the regular season mvp but choke in play-off time and amount to nothing, how could they be the MVP? It&#039;s debatable and every scenario is different but I think what one accomplishes in the post-season should be a factor, too, hence me suggesting it should be determined at the end of the season (if it isn&#039;t already that way but I want to say it is for some reason). <br /><br />With that being said, two guys really come to mind here: mikehail and Jenova, with Star, Ralph and Rus not far behind. BBC would probably still be pretty damn good without mikehail, but I think he&#039;s what makes the masterbowl favorites in many the eyes of many. He&#039;s one of top fraggers and the flag capture leader so that has to count for something. That being said, Jen isn&#039;t far behind and although I love Stall and Saber&#039;s games, I don&#039;t see them being a playoff team without Jen. So if I had to vote for anyone, given stats and what they mean to their teams as well as overall ability, I&#039;d go with mikehail.<br /><br />Mike for prez. 