This is an interesting idea but allow me to pose a couple of hypotheticals.<br /><br />1.) Mikehail joins IDL next season as a captain. He invests $ in a Seattle server. IDL says &quot;Hey thanks mike for donating a server!&quot; Mike joins a team and they set their home-field to Seattle server. At this point half of all of Mikes games are on a West coast server. This IDL we have ZERO west-coast players. If Mike was playing we&#039;d have one. It makes little to no sense to have a West coast server for IDL.<br /><br />2.) BBC drafts Mantis and Gyrossman. They choose Montreal as their home-field server. Week 1 Montreal goes down hours before the game is slated to be played. BBC asserts their home field and wants to postpone until the server is back up. The opposing team (let&#039;s say WAD) refuses. What to do?<br /><br />The reason we have a default server is by and large to avoid server disputes. It solves a lot of administrative problems and it gives captains some flexibility but not leverage against one another. Home-fields aren&#039;t a bad idea but consider the potential disasters that await us in doing something like that. A more reasonable solution is to change the default server. I would personally be far more inclined to change the default server than to institute a home/away system for teams. We currently have people threatening to boycott a week of IDL over map textures, think about the horror that would result of we made Saber play on NJ or Dev play in Georgia. It&#039;s a can of worms I&#039;d rather not open.