[quote author=Xenaero link=topic=134.msg1044#msg1044 date=1251224880]<br />[quote author=Tai link=topic=134.msg1043#msg1043 date=1251223962]<br />The #1 seed only gets to use their homefield once, though. Saying &quot;it&#039;s not fair, it&#039;s not fair, the #1 seed is too good on the map they played&quot; is just childish to me.<br />[/quote]<br /><br />A side note before I begin, Tai, I highly doubt SUC would be affected by this change, since that&#039;s obviously what you think I&#039;m referring to. It&#039;s not like anyone has ended their streak on any map yet.<br /><br />OK. Part of my argument was the rhetorical question that you derived your incorrect assumption of my stance from. I think you didn&#039;t actually read the paragraph and just instead skimmed it without thinking about what I was saying. I didn&#039;t say &quot;it&#039;s not fair, it&#039;s not fair, the #1 seed is too good on the map they played&quot; once during the paragraph. If they&#039;re good enough to carry on, they&#039;ll win no matter the map, right? They&#039;ll prove themselves to go to the Masterbowl just like SUC and BBC did this season. What I&#039;m suggesting is an idea towards making it more competitive post-season. Now, what I was [b]hoping[/b] people would do is help refine the idea or give some [b]valuable[/b] (&lt;--- key word) input on it.<br />[/quote]<br /><br />Yeah, I did read it. Just because I disagree doesn&#039;t mean I didn&#039;t understand what you were saying.&nbsp; <br /><br />But here&#039;s what I got from it: <br /><br />In the wildcard: <br /><br /> Higher seed wins --&gt; The loser&#039;s map is used in the conference championship. So basically, neither of the top 2 teams&#039; maps are used.....instead, they&#039;d be using the map of the team that&#039;s out of the playoffs. What? <br /><br />Lower seed wins --&gt; That team can decide to use their map or the top seed in the conference&#039;s map.<br /><br />In other words, the top seed may possibly not be able to play on their homefield map. <br /><br />One word: Pointless. <br /><br />You reallyw ant the lower seed to have their map played that bad? Here&#039;s a suggestion.<br /><br />Make playoffs a best of 3: First round&#039;s the top seed&#039;s map, 2nd round&#039;s the lower seed map, and if the teams are tied after two rounds, last round&#039;s the top seed&#039;s map. If it goes to OT, the team with the most flags after three rounds gets their map played for the remainder of the match. If even then the flags are tied, then alternate maps again, starting with the top seed&#039;s map.<br /><br />Pick and prod with that suggestion has you please. I&#039;d much rather see that then the top 2 seeds&#039; maps not being played if those were the teams to make the conference championship. 