Having two different IDL wads floating around for one season is a horrible idea. The board made their decision to include certain qualities of maps that people voted strongly against. Now, it is true, though the board made the poll and wanted peoples&#039; opinions, they are not obligated to act on them. However, the constant theme I&#039;ve seen from this current board since it&#039;s inception has been giving the people what they want (team names were a big one and that was what ultimately won it over). <br /><br />I&#039;m not using this as an opportunity to bash the board, the commissioner or anybody involved. When you have a system dependent upon voting, people will disagree even after decisions are set in stone. That&#039;s just how it goes. But what this ultimately comes down to is Ralph&#039;s wad vs The Board&#039;s wad and in essence, Ralph vs The Board. We can pick sides, we can complain or we can do something better: be productive. Someone let go of their ego and give the people what they want. Vote on the wads. Whichever wins is the final. <br /><br />I know Ralph&#039;s wad went against the board&#039;s wishes and ultimately looks bad upon the board if they cave and allow Ralph&#039;s wad to be introduced. However, it seems to be what the people want. It also seems to be less confusing and requires the least amount of work (Ralph&#039;s wad would be final, no more releases). <br /><br />In closing, let&#039;s all use some common sense here. The players would not be without the board and the board would not be without the players. Both sides need each other. It seems the majority want Ralph&#039;s wad so let&#039;s just go with it, man. If it turns out I&#039;m wrong, then hey, go with the new version. Either way, a vote would easily clear this up.&nbsp; 