Situation # 1 would never happen because a server in the west coast would never be approved by the IDL administration due to the lack of being a central server. <br /><br />As of situation #2, it could easily be resolved. Rules can be put in to place to avoid the postponement of games. As a captain, I know that I would have no problem playing on TT if Montreal was down. This situation we have now is counting games on the default server (TT) when players can&#039;t even move properly because of problems with the server. I believe that if we put in this situation of &quot;Home/away&quot; servers, it will beneficial for the IDL population as a whole and it will help us reach this idea of &#039;parity&#039; that everyone always seems to be talking about. Why should a few people benefit from a default server that is better for them and all the others who have bad connections to TT suffer? Because the IDL board refuses to reach parity because these servers are better for them? I have no idea, but if your excuse is I that you don&#039;t want to put in effort&nbsp; in reaching parity(&#039;don&#039;t want to open that can of worms&#039;) then that is pretty pathetic.