A lot of very good points here being brought up... I will apologize in the fact my first post I only posted a huge criticism I have and not any praise. That means I only offered a small amount of my opinion.<br /><br />As for the server stuff, I completely understand what Nostar is saying about having server admins being cooperative to the point where we could get some true variety. I hope someone out there at some point does make a commitment as a server admin to help the IDL out and bring in more variety. Relying on just one server to me is no good for the league as it probably does turn some people completely off.<br /><br />Though going through the year frustrated with not being able to do what I normally do, I enjoy the competition of IDL. I like the structure and the way it plays out. Though the team I was on got hit a few times by the scheduling, I think inputting that this year WAS a good idea in retrospect. It gave people a solid time to be there and eliminated a large amount of arguing over getting times straight. The scheduling can be better like Ladna said, but to me a step in the right direction.<br /><br />About the 4on4... I would also prefer 4on4, but with the IDL... I just dont know if 4on4 would ever effectively work out with the amount of players we have. With 4on4, it would take 5 people to be on a team and then get 8 people together at one time from each match to play out every week. That&#039;s not easy by any means...<br /><br />I personally need to get better in a 3on3 environment... I&#039;ve always played huge matches in public CTF and maybe I need to change more of what I do in a small 3on3 setting. I also enjoy a more offensive battle and 4on4 would probably provide that. The last match of the season KGB was able to actually light it up and score a lot of flags... That was fun as hell. Most weeks we barely cracked 2 or 3 flags :( .<br /><br />Now... Here is one idea I have been thinking about and I think I mentioned this in a past season.<br /><br />To me, it would be awesome to erase the time limit. Have one 15 minute match .... then a 2 minute break (at this point we COULD get substitutions or adjustments for what isn&#039;t working and give a team a chance to make a comeback rather than just running through 2 or 3 rounds) ... then of course have the next 15 minute session. This would make every match 30 minutes, but could make some extremely good games. Instead of two teams duking it out for a race to 5... You are scoring whatever you can in a 30 minute match. Instead of winning rounds... You win by the amount of flags you score.<br /><br />There would be some issues to that like if it ended up a 3on2... Those kind of issues could be worked out though... Just a starter idea above.<br /><br />I&#039;m sure there is more praises and criticisms I could offer at the moment, but I&#039;ll just leave it with these for now&nbsp; ;D<br /><br /><br />