[quote author=Tai link=topic=134.msg1046#msg1046 date=1251238249]<br />Yeah, I did read it. Just because I disagree doesn&#039;t mean I didn&#039;t understand what you were saying.&nbsp; <br /><br />But here&#039;s what I got from it: <br /><br />In the wildcard: <br /><br /> Higher seed wins --&gt; The loser&#039;s map is used in the conference championship. So basically, neither of the top 2 teams&#039; maps are used.....instead, they&#039;d be using the map of the team that&#039;s out of the playoffs. What? <br /><br />Lower seed wins --&gt; That team can decide to use their map or the top seed in the conference&#039;s map.<br /><br />In other words, the top seed may possibly not be able to play on their homefield map. <br /><br />One word: Pointless. <br /><br />You reallyw ant the lower seed to have their map played that bad? Here&#039;s a suggestion.<br /><br />Make playoffs a best of 3: First round&#039;s the top seed&#039;s map, 2nd round&#039;s the lower seed map, and if the teams are tied after two rounds, last round&#039;s the top seed&#039;s map. If it goes to OT, the team with the most flags after three rounds gets their map played for the remainder of the match. If even then the flags are tied, then alternate maps again, starting with the top seed&#039;s map.<br /><br />Pick and prod with that suggestion has you please. I&#039;d much rather see that then the top 2 seeds&#039; maps not being played if those were the teams to make the conference championship.<br />[/quote]<br /><br />Hmm, maybe the losing wildcard team&#039;s playoff field could be used in the tiebreaker, so all three maps get played! Now that would be hella crazy and pretty exciting. At the same time, it requires a lot of effort on the part of the server admins, said effort might be too much to organize. I suppose it could be solved with a maplist, though. Not a bad idea, though. :D