Ya making a team use there 4th at least 1 round does sound rather interesting, but in that spec why bother having a sub at all if all 4 members are required to play every match just up the teams to 4v4 instead.&nbsp;  With that said I&#039;ve always held my opinion on 3v3 vs 4v4. (lists advantages and disadvantages) <br /><br />Now about [b][size=3]winning[/size][/b] 3 out of 5 games to win the match. I like the idea of &quot;no such thing as ties&quot; I mean that why most other sports league use overtime, extra innings, shoot outs, tie breakers. (ect.) Hell I know I complain about the overtime function in private, but we got that damn thing why not use it. :P <br /><br />Now on to the other few things that seem to be bothering a few people. Player trading every season always seems to bug/annoy someone. Could we just take out trading all together? The answer would have to be a pure an utter No. If we were to take it out might as well just make this a Random Team Tourney instead of an actual league. So to maybe shut a select few up we could use the cost system that keeps getting thrown around, but no doubt someone else would start bitching or the same people for that matter for reasons like &quot;This player is worth too much OMGWTF!&quot; or the opposite as well. I think this would still be our best bet instead of lets say having a board tell us if the trades are reasonable. <br /><br />Let move on to home field advantage, my first idea was to take it out completely. This would work, but i would like to propose an alternative. Lets say Team A picks map01 as home field Team B picked map02. Now Game 1 and 2 is played on map01 and Game 3 and 4 are played on map02. Since Team A had the better season than Team B the final game if needed would be played on map01. I think that is the best compromise I&#039;ve come up with so far when dealing with home field complaints. 