I can think you had a good season as captain and still not think you&#039;re a good captain in general. I think that is valid. <br /><br />Also what dewww and I are saying is we think that &quot;lumping&quot; of categories is stupid and devalues the ROY award, which as I said, is indicative of very specific things. My solution to that was to have 2 different categories and I posted a nominee for both.<br /><br />[quote author=Hatred link=topic=624.msg6417#msg6417 date=1331156647]<br />The only reason why I gave him [b]breakout player of the year award[/b] was because he had his best statistical season ever. <br />[/quote]<br /><br />You mean because he was on your team AND had his best statistical season ever? While he did have his best season statistically he isn&#039;t far off from his previous stats. Not out of line with a stats bump someone might get playing on a better team. Furthermore lots of guys had their best statistical season ever. You, Chaindude and Prime all had your best statistical seasons ever. However one of those players was on a team that wasn&#039;t stacked, lost their first rounder and still won his division. Another one of those players broke the all-time flag cap record by means you wish to diminish for some reason. Even you are a better breakout candidate for coming off of 3 losing seasons, 2 as a captain, and going undefeated. I think Blood had a good season. I think he had a good season last year and the year before too, and yeah his rookie season that he won the MB wasn&#039;t too shabby either. I think if you want to gives these awards on merits you arguments are weak. Then again say what you want. They are just opinions.