First of all, that would be excellent.&nbsp; Hand-picking four new board members would give me the opportunity to create a board of active, mature, and level-headed players with no strong clique or clan affiliations.&nbsp; A similar sentiment was expressed yesterday in #idl by our founder and former commissioner:<br /><br />[color=brown]&lt;Ralphis&gt; not to put anybody on the spot but now HumanBones and MassVC have an opportunity to get on the same page and restock the board and restore some order here[/color]<br /><br />Second of all, you were on the board long enough to know that that isn&#039;t how it works.&nbsp; The commissioner nominates board members, and the remaining board members (me) vote to elect.&nbsp; So if we go by the rules, bones picks &#039;em, and I knock &#039;em down (or not).&nbsp; Since the rules address adding [i]a[/i] board member and not [i]four[/i] board members, this is only how it would work for the first guy, after which both of us would vote to elect, then all three of us, and finally all four of us.<br /><br />Third of all, given the special circumstances, we might not use the official process to elect a new board.&nbsp; (Besides, we can just change the official process and then use the &quot;official process!&quot;)&nbsp; More likely we would just agree on an impressive list of names.<br /><br />Fourth of all and finally, we might not create another board.&nbsp; I only talked to Bones about it for a while last night, but we are both skeptical as to whether it is better to have a group of five people bickering for hours on end only to end on some half-hearted and inconsistent agreements or no agreements at all.&nbsp; Rather, it&#039;s conceivable that the league could be run by just one or two people who keep an ear to the players&#039; needs.